2022 NCAA Basketball Tournament: A Point Spread Review
by Al McMordie
Saturday, Apr 02, 2022The 2022 NCAA Basketball Tournament has certainly had a lot of surprises along the way. But it wasn't as crazy as the 2021 Tourney, when there were a record-setting 16 wins by teams seeded 10 or worse (not including the "First Four" play-in round). This tournament "only" had 13 wins by teams seeded 10 or worse. But it did also have the historic journey of #15-seed Saint Peter's, which became the first team seeded 13 (or higher) to reach the Elite Eight round. The 2021 event also had the most upsets (14) by a team seeded at least 5 spots worse than its opponent, but this tournament fell just shy of that mark with 12 such upsets. But, like last year, when the final matched-up #1 seeds Baylor and Gonzaga, the cream eventually rose to the top this season, and we have three teams in the Final Four seeded #1 or #2. Only #8 North Carolina is truly a dark horse.Let's take a look at first four rounds of this tournament, from a point spread perspective. We'll not include the First Four games in this analysis.The most striking fact is that underdogs have done very well, as they've gone 33-26 ATS (with one game a PK). Here is a breakdown by seeds:#1 seeds: 9-3 SU, 3-9 ATS#2 seeds: 9-2 SU, 8-3 ATS#3 seeds: 6-4 SU, 4-6 ATS#4 seeds: 8-4 SU, 5-7 ATS#5 seeds: 4-4 SU, 4-4 ATS#6 seeds: 1-4 SU, 1-4 ATS#7 seeds: 3-4 SU, 3-4 ATS#8 seeds: 4-3 SU, 4-3 ATS#9 seeds: 3-4 SU, 6-1 ATS#10 seeds: 3-4 SU, 3-4 ATS#11 seeds: 5-4 SU, 6-3 ATS#12 seeds: 2-4 SU, 3-3 ATS#13 seeds: 0-4 SU, 3-1 ATS#14 seeds: 0-4 SU, 1-3 ATS#15 seeds: 3-4 SU, 4-3 ATS#16 seeds: 0-4 SU, 2-2 ATSAnd here is a breakdown of point spread ranges:Underdogs of +3.5 or less: 9-11 ATSUnderdogs +4 to +7.5: 10-6 ATSUnderdogs +8 to +11.5: 7-2 ATSUnderdogs of +12 or more: 7-7 ATSLike last season, the games have tended to go under the total, as the unders are 34-26 through the first four rounds (35-29 if you include the "First Four games).Let's take a look at some other point spread situations:Teams that won their conference tournament (against foes that didn't win their conference tournament): 15-16 ATSTeams off a straight-up loss (against foes not off a loss): 8-9 ATSTeams off back-to-back losses (against foes not off back-to-back losses): 3-2 ATSTeams off ATS loss (against foes not off an ATS loss): 13-17 ATSTeams off back-to-back-ATS losses (against foes not off back-to-back ATS losses): 12-12 ATSTeams off back-to-back ATS wins (against foes not off back-to-back ATS wins): 19-13 ATSTeams off 3 SU/ATS wins (against foes not off 3 SU/ATS wins): 13-9 ATSTeams off an upset win (against foes not off an upset win): 11-10 ATSTeams off an upset loss (against foes not off an upset loss): 6-8 ATSTeams off a double-digit win (against foes not off a double-digit win): 13-10 ATSTeams playing with revenge: 3-1 ATSGood luck, as always...Al McMordie
Read more